{"id":92667,"date":"2026-06-04T09:53:07","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T09:53:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/"},"modified":"2026-06-04T09:53:07","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T09:53:07","slug":"tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A 26\u00aa C\u00e2mara Civil do Tribunal Regional de Estugarda rejeitou em 21 de maio de 2026 a a\u00e7\u00e3o de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o da propriet\u00e1ria do navio de transporte de autom\u00f3veis <em>Felicity Ace<\/em> e de cinco seguradoras mar\u00edtimas contra a Porsche AG. As autoras reivindicaram indeniza\u00e7\u00f5es no valor de quase 30 milh\u00f5es de euros, baseadas na responsabilidade do produtor.<\/p>\n<p>A a\u00e7\u00e3o foi movida pela propriet\u00e1ria do navio e pelas cinco seguradoras que deveriam cobrir os danos. A Porsche, uma empresa do grupo Volkswagen com sede em Estugarda, estava envolvida como r\u00e9 no processo.<\/p>\n<h3>Inc\u00eandio a bordo e naufr\u00e1gio do navio<\/h3>\n<p>O navio de transporte de autom\u00f3veis carregou quase 4.000 ve\u00edculos novos, incluindo ve\u00edculos el\u00e9tricos, no porto de Emden no in\u00edcio de fevereiro de 2022. Em 10 de fevereiro de 2022, o navio deixou o porto em dire\u00e7\u00e3o aos EUA. Seis dias depois, um inc\u00eandio eclodiu a bordo, cuja causa exata \u00e9 contestada entre as partes. A tripula\u00e7\u00e3o p\u00f4de ser evacuada, enquanto o inc\u00eandio se espalhou nos dias seguintes. O navio afundou finalmente em 1\u00ba de mar\u00e7o de 2022 a uma profundidade de 3.000 m ao sul dos A\u00e7ores.<\/p>\n<p>No total, 1.117 Porsche, 1.944 Audi, 561 Volkswagen, 189 Bentley e 85 Lamborghini foram perdidos, incluindo 15 Lamborghini Aventador LP 780-4 Ultimae de alto valor, com um pre\u00e7o estimado individual superior a 500.000 USD. Estes eram a \u00faltima edi\u00e7\u00e3o do modelo, cuja produ\u00e7\u00e3o j\u00e1 havia sido encerrada naquele momento. Analistas estimaram que o dano causado pela perda da carga variou entre 334 e 401 milh\u00f5es de USD.<\/p>\n<p>As autoras alegaram que uma bateria de \u00edon de l\u00edtio auto-inflam\u00e1vel de um Porsche Taycan foi respons\u00e1vel pelo inc\u00eandio. A Porsche, por sua vez, negou essa alega\u00e7\u00e3o e apontou outra poss\u00edvel causa do inc\u00eandio. As autoras exigiram a repara\u00e7\u00e3o dos danos causados pelo inc\u00eandio e pelo naufr\u00e1gio do navio.<\/p>\n<h3>Senten\u00e7a do Tribunal Regional de Estugarda<\/h3>\n<p>O Tribunal Regional de Estugarda decidiu que as autoras n\u00e3o t\u00eam direito a indeniza\u00e7\u00f5es. Ap\u00f3s a realiza\u00e7\u00e3o da coleta de provas, a c\u00e2mara n\u00e3o ficou convencida de que um Porsche Taycan tivesse causado o inc\u00eandio em 16 de fevereiro de 2022.<\/p>\n<p>A senten\u00e7a ainda n\u00e3o \u00e9 definitiva, e as partes t\u00eam a possibilidade de recorrer da decis\u00e3o. O n\u00famero do processo \u00e9 26 O 30\/23.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.porsche.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">www.porsche.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>O Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeitou a a\u00e7\u00e3o de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o da propriet\u00e1ria do navio transportador de autom\u00f3veis *Felicity Ace* contra a Porsche AG, pois n\u00e3o havia reivindica\u00e7\u00f5es v\u00e1lidas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":92662,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1626,1622,44386,9092,1623,1617,44505,1619],"tags":[57186,57187,20490,57188,22375,57189,57190,57191,57192,57193,57194,57195,57196,57197,57198,57199,57200,7919,1796,57201,57202,57203,57204,57205,2125,57206,57207,22396,57208,57209,2133,1831,57210,57211,57212,2148,57213,57214,57215,57216,57217,57218,57219,57220,57221,57222,20520,57223,2155,1837,57224,7944,57225,57226,57227,57228,57229],"class_list":["post-92667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-asia-pacifico","category-automovel","category-deutschland","category-europa","category-expedicao-e-logistica","category-mercadorias-perigosas","category-navegacao-e-portos","tag-appeal-district-court","tag-appel-tribunal-de-district","tag-assurance-navale","tag-autotransportschiff","tag-batterie-lithium-ion","tag-berufung-landgericht","tag-brandursache","tag-car-transport-ship","tag-cause-de-lincendie","tag-cause-of-fire","tag-chambre-civile-stuttgart","tag-civil-chamber-stuttgart-francais-porsche","tag-damage-claim","tag-damage-claims","tag-demande-de-dommages-interets","tag-demandes-de-dommages-interets","tag-deutsch-porsche","tag-electric-vehicles","tag-elektrofahrzeuge","tag-emden-port","tag-felicity-ace","tag-groupe-volkswagen","tag-hafen-emden","tag-incendie-de-navire","tag-industrie-du-transport","tag-landgericht-stuttgart","tag-legal-dispute-porsche","tag-lithium-ion-battery","tag-lithium-ionen-batterie","tag-litige-juridique-porsche","tag-logistics-service-providers","tag-logistikdienstleister","tag-navire-de-transport-automobile","tag-porsche-taycan","tag-port-demden","tag-prestataires-de-services-logistiques","tag-product-liability","tag-produzentenhaftung","tag-profondeur-deau-acores","tag-rechtsstreit-porsche","tag-responsabilite-du-produit","tag-schadensersatzansprueche","tag-schadensersatzklage","tag-schiffsbrand","tag-schiffsversicherungen","tag-ship-fire","tag-ship-insurance","tag-stuttgart-district-court","tag-transport-industry","tag-transportwirtschaft","tag-tribunal-de-district-de-stuttgart","tag-vehicules-electriques","tag-volkswagen-group","tag-volkswagen-gruppe","tag-wassertiefe-azoren","tag-water-depth-azores","tag-zivilkammer-stuttgart-english-porsche"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_PT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"O Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeitou a a\u00e7\u00e3o de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o da propriet\u00e1ria do navio transportador de autom\u00f3veis *Felicity Ace* contra a Porsche AG, pois n\u00e3o havia reivindica\u00e7\u00f5es v\u00e1lidas.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ITJ | International Transport Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1322\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"744\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andreas Haug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andreas Haug\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo estimado de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Andreas Haug\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cf538b3157f15afd7589245a4b3dbd25\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":412,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"appeal district court\",\"appel tribunal de district\",\"assurance navale\",\"Autotransportschiff\",\"batterie lithium-ion\",\"Berufung Landgericht\",\"Brandursache\",\"car transport ship\",\"cause de l'incendie\",\"cause of fire\",\"chambre civile Stuttgart\",\"civil chamber Stuttgart Fran\u00e7ais Porsche\",\"damage claim\",\"damage claims\",\"demande de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats\",\"demandes de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats\",\"Deutsch Porsche\",\"electric vehicles\",\"Elektrofahrzeuge\",\"Emden port\",\"Felicity Ace\",\"groupe Volkswagen\",\"Hafen Emden\",\"incendie de navire\",\"industrie du transport\",\"Landgericht Stuttgart\",\"legal dispute Porsche\",\"lithium-ion battery\",\"Lithium-Ionen-Batterie\",\"litige juridique Porsche\",\"logistics service providers\",\"Logistikdienstleister\",\"navire de transport automobile\",\"Porsche Taycan\",\"port d'Emden\",\"prestataires de services logistiques\",\"product liability\",\"Produzentenhaftung\",\"profondeur d'eau A\u00e7ores\",\"Rechtsstreit Porsche\",\"responsabilit\u00e9 du produit\",\"Schadensersatzanspr\u00fcche\",\"Schadensersatzklage\",\"Schiffsbrand\",\"Schiffsversicherungen\",\"ship fire\",\"ship insurance\",\"Stuttgart District Court\",\"transport industry\",\"Transportwirtschaft\",\"tribunal de district de Stuttgart\",\"v\u00e9hicules \u00e9lectriques\",\"Volkswagen Group\",\"Volkswagen-Gruppe\",\"Wassertiefe Azoren\",\"water depth Azores\",\"Zivilkammer Stuttgart English Porsche\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Am\u00e9ricas\",\"\u00c1sia\\\/Pac\u00edfico\",\"Autom\u00f3vel\",\"Deutschland\",\"Europa\",\"Expedi\u00e7\u00e3o de Mercadorias e Log\u00edstica\",\"Mercadorias perigosas\",\"Navega\u00e7\u00e3o e portos\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg\",\"width\":1322,\"height\":744},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/04\\\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"ITJ | International Transport Journal\",\"description\":\"Stay informed with the latest global news from the transport, logistics, and supply chain industries. Transport Journal delivers expert insights, analysis, and updates across shipping, aviation, intermodal, and forwarding.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Logismedia Group AG\",\"alternateName\":\"Logismedia Group AG\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-PT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Logo_ITJ.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Logo_ITJ.png\",\"width\":799,\"height\":326,\"caption\":\"Logismedia Group AG\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/56456496\\\/admin\\\/dashboard\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/logismediagroup\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LogiamediaGroupAG\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cf538b3157f15afd7589245a4b3dbd25\",\"name\":\"Andreas Haug\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/transportjournal.com\\\/pt-pt\\\/author\\\/andreas\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/","og_locale":"pt_PT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal","og_description":"O Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeitou a a\u00e7\u00e3o de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o da propriet\u00e1ria do navio transportador de autom\u00f3veis *Felicity Ace* contra a Porsche AG, pois n\u00e3o havia reivindica\u00e7\u00f5es v\u00e1lidas.","og_url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/","og_site_name":"ITJ | International Transport Journal","article_published_time":"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1322,"height":744,"url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Andreas Haug","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Andreas Haug","Tempo estimado de leitura":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/"},"author":{"name":"Andreas Haug","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/cf538b3157f15afd7589245a4b3dbd25"},"headline":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche","datePublished":"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/"},"wordCount":412,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg","keywords":["appeal district court","appel tribunal de district","assurance navale","Autotransportschiff","batterie lithium-ion","Berufung Landgericht","Brandursache","car transport ship","cause de l'incendie","cause of fire","chambre civile Stuttgart","civil chamber Stuttgart Fran\u00e7ais Porsche","damage claim","damage claims","demande de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats","demandes de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats","Deutsch Porsche","electric vehicles","Elektrofahrzeuge","Emden port","Felicity Ace","groupe Volkswagen","Hafen Emden","incendie de navire","industrie du transport","Landgericht Stuttgart","legal dispute Porsche","lithium-ion battery","Lithium-Ionen-Batterie","litige juridique Porsche","logistics service providers","Logistikdienstleister","navire de transport automobile","Porsche Taycan","port d'Emden","prestataires de services logistiques","product liability","Produzentenhaftung","profondeur d'eau A\u00e7ores","Rechtsstreit Porsche","responsabilit\u00e9 du produit","Schadensersatzanspr\u00fcche","Schadensersatzklage","Schiffsbrand","Schiffsversicherungen","ship fire","ship insurance","Stuttgart District Court","transport industry","Transportwirtschaft","tribunal de district de Stuttgart","v\u00e9hicules \u00e9lectriques","Volkswagen Group","Volkswagen-Gruppe","Wassertiefe Azoren","water depth Azores","Zivilkammer Stuttgart English Porsche"],"articleSection":["Am\u00e9ricas","\u00c1sia\/Pac\u00edfico","Autom\u00f3vel","Deutschland","Europa","Expedi\u00e7\u00e3o de Mercadorias e Log\u00edstica","Mercadorias perigosas","Navega\u00e7\u00e3o e portos"],"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/","name":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche - ITJ | International Transport Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg","datePublished":"2026-06-04T09:53:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-PT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/Felicity-Ace-afunda-2-aspect-ratio-1400-788.jpeg","width":1322,"height":744},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/2026\/06\/04\/tribunal-regional-de-stuttgart-rejeita-acao-contra-a-porsche\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal Regional de Stuttgart rejeita a\u00e7\u00e3o contra a Porsche"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/","name":"ITJ | International Transport Journal","description":"Stay informed with the latest global news from the transport, logistics, and supply chain industries. Transport Journal delivers expert insights, analysis, and updates across shipping, aviation, intermodal, and forwarding.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-PT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#organization","name":"Logismedia Group AG","alternateName":"Logismedia Group AG","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-PT","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/09\/Logo_ITJ.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/09\/Logo_ITJ.png","width":799,"height":326,"caption":"Logismedia Group AG"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/56456496\/admin\/dashboard\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/logismediagroup\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LogiamediaGroupAG"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/#\/schema\/person\/cf538b3157f15afd7589245a4b3dbd25","name":"Andreas Haug","url":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/author\/andreas\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92667\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transportjournal.com\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}